Search for: All records

Identifying thermodynamically stable crystal structures remains a key challenge in materials chemistry. Computational crystal structure prediction (CSP) workflows typically rank candidate structures by lattice energy to assess relative stability. Approaches using self-consistent first-principles calculations become prohibitively expensive, especially when millions of energy evaluations are required for complex molecular systems with many atoms per unit cell. Here, we provide a detailed analysis of our methodology and results from the seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction organized by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC). We present an approach that significantly accelerates CSP by training target-specific machine learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs). AIMNet2 MLIPs are trained on density functional theory (DFT) calculations of molecular clusters, herein referred to as n-mers. We demonstrate that potentials trained on gas phase dispersion-corrected DFT reference data of n-mers successfully extend to crystalline environments, accurately characterizing the CSP landscape and correctly ranking structures by relative stability. Our methodology effectively captures the underlying physics of thermodynamic crystal stability using only molecular cluster data, avoiding the need for expensive periodic calculations. The performance of target-specific AIMNet2 interatomic potentials is illustrated across diverse chemical systems relevant to pharmaceutical, optoelectronic, and agrochemical applications, demonstrating their promise as efficient alternatives to full DFT calculations for routine CSP tasks. 

A seventh blind test of crystal structure prediction has been organized by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. The results are presented in two parts, with this second part focusing on methods for ranking crystal structures in order of stability. The exercise involved standardized sets of structures seeded from a range of structure generation methods. Participants from 22 groups applied several periodic DFT-D methods, machine learned potentials, force fields derived from empirical data or quantum chemical calculations, and various combinations of the above. In addition, one non-energy-based scoring function was used. Results showed that periodic DFT-D methods overall agreed with experimental data within expected error margins, while one machine learned model, applying system-specific AIMnet potentials, agreed with experiment in many cases demonstrating promise as an efficient alternative to DFT-based methods. For target XXXII, a consensus was reached across periodic DFT methods, with consistently high predicted energies of experimental forms relative to the global minimum (above 4 kJ mol⁻¹at both low and ambient temperatures) suggesting a more stable polymorph is likely not yet observed. The calculation of free energies at ambient temperatures offered improvement of predictions only in some cases (for targets XXVII and XXXI). Several avenues for future research have been suggested, highlighting the need for greater efficiency considering the vast amounts of resources utilized in many cases.